implying Exs has both the time and the will to actually work on it
I'll probably just warn Exs once I've finished working on it and have him rate it - then, he can start editing it himself if he's unsatisfied with it, but he'll probably just tell me to go back and work on it again if that's the case.
Really, this is pretty much everything that can be done. That immense wall of text actually takes a lot of time to work on, and I'm not too sure Exs has that kind of time in his hands. Besides, me receiving directions from Exs and the community already counts as two heads working as one for the most part, since I'll report back after any changes.
Mmkay, I'm glad the format was good, then. Hmm, but... maybe I'll try changing it to an "against the ban" and "for the ban" format, eventually concluding every topic with a "for the ban" through argumentation, like in those dissertations people are supposed to learn how to write somewhere? :<
("Dissertation", as in "logical and unbiased". I think I understand what's wrong with the page for the most part, tbh it's pretty embarassing to have made a mistake such as this. I wasn't aware of Wikipedia's NPOV, either.)