Sure, thanks for saying that all my sets "will only work once or against people that are marginally less smart than the average user", I appreciate it :<
Just because it's a set idea, it doesn't mean it shouldn't be
discussed, you know. Discussion is also useful for testing itself: for example, when I do test the Rain Dance ASanae set, I'll make sure I use it in a specific way, not trying to outright sweep, and likely switching in and out often. Likewise, I'll discard the TWave SG-abuse set even before using it, because TSanae would likely do a better job. And I would have taken none of either decisions had I not posted the set.
Instead, I think it should be okay for set ideas to be posted and discussed,
as long as the author makes absolutely sure for everyone who's reading that it's untested, just an idea and still up for discussion. I
did try to make that clear, what with all the conditionals I used and all, but I guess I should've made it clearer than that.
tl;dr: please consider making the rule "if it's untested, make it absolutely and crystal clear that it's just a set idea" instead of outright banning untested sets.
But well, if you still say no even after hearing me out, I'll comply. It's just that it'd honestly help me out a lot if I was allowed to discuss things - it did in the past - and banning every set idea discourages the creation of UU sets and such.
To wrap things up, here's a delicious sandvich for you all.